<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Musings</title>
	<link>http://www.melindasnodgrass.com/musings</link>
	<description>Rational Life</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Another One by Melinda</title>
		<link>http://www.melindasnodgrass.com/musings/2008/07/13/another-one/#comment-1980</link>
		<author>Melinda</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.melindasnodgrass.com/musings/2008/07/13/another-one/#comment-1980</guid>
					<description>It's typical that the writer gets ignored.  I read something funny in Variety -- The directors just look our for themselves.  The writers are bitter, and the actors are crazy.  The author of the article was writing about the labor disputes and negotiations.  I thought it summed things up pretty damn well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s typical that the writer gets ignored.  I read something funny in Variety &#8212; The directors just look our for themselves.  The writers are bitter, and the actors are crazy.  The author of the article was writing about the labor disputes and negotiations.  I thought it summed things up pretty damn well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Another One by Christine Valada</title>
		<link>http://www.melindasnodgrass.com/musings/2008/07/13/another-one/#comment-1979</link>
		<author>Christine Valada</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.melindasnodgrass.com/musings/2008/07/13/another-one/#comment-1979</guid>
					<description>And the one's who can write, started off in the Writers Guild.

Len enjoyed Hellboy 2 for its look as well.  Guillermo gave him a nod in the EW article that ran last week.  

We went to see a mystery-murder film that Gillian Horvath wrote for Here! at Outfest yesterday.  We really liked the film, but Gillian said it bore very little resemblance to what she wrote, and, in the end, lots of it did not make sense.  But there were some very nice directing moments.  The director--who neglected to even point out that one of the writers was in the audience when he spoke before the film--talked about how he's wanted these films to be Nick and Nora Charles-like mysteries, with a gay married couple.  In fact, much of the banter between the detective and his partner was light and funny.  It actually makes me want to find the books they were based on and read them.  Margo Kidder made for one-half of an interesting lesbian couple.  With only one nekkid male tush, this film could easily be shown on regular TV, but it's got a limited release and can be seen on Here!'s subscription cable and on the Internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the one&#8217;s who can write, started off in the Writers Guild.</p>
<p>Len enjoyed Hellboy 2 for its look as well.  Guillermo gave him a nod in the EW article that ran last week.  </p>
<p>We went to see a mystery-murder film that Gillian Horvath wrote for Here! at Outfest yesterday.  We really liked the film, but Gillian said it bore very little resemblance to what she wrote, and, in the end, lots of it did not make sense.  But there were some very nice directing moments.  The director&#8211;who neglected to even point out that one of the writers was in the audience when he spoke before the film&#8211;talked about how he&#8217;s wanted these films to be Nick and Nora Charles-like mysteries, with a gay married couple.  In fact, much of the banter between the detective and his partner was light and funny.  It actually makes me want to find the books they were based on and read them.  Margo Kidder made for one-half of an interesting lesbian couple.  With only one nekkid male tush, this film could easily be shown on regular TV, but it&#8217;s got a limited release and can be seen on Here!&#8217;s subscription cable and on the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Another One by S.C. Butler</title>
		<link>http://www.melindasnodgrass.com/musings/2008/07/13/another-one/#comment-1978</link>
		<author>S.C. Butler</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.melindasnodgrass.com/musings/2008/07/13/another-one/#comment-1978</guid>
					<description>If there's anything we've learned from Hollywood in the last thirty years, it's that most directors (and producers for that matter) can't write.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there&#8217;s anything we&#8217;ve learned from Hollywood in the last thirty years, it&#8217;s that most directors (and producers for that matter) can&#8217;t write.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mainlining Movies by S.C. Butler</title>
		<link>http://www.melindasnodgrass.com/musings/2008/07/09/mainlining-movies/#comment-1977</link>
		<author>S.C. Butler</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.melindasnodgrass.com/musings/2008/07/09/mainlining-movies/#comment-1977</guid>
					<description>I'm actually researching this question on the web right now, but so far all I've found is rampant speculation from folks as ignorant as myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually researching this question on the web right now, but so far all I&#8217;ve found is rampant speculation from folks as ignorant as myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mainlining Movies by Melinda</title>
		<link>http://www.melindasnodgrass.com/musings/2008/07/09/mainlining-movies/#comment-1976</link>
		<author>Melinda</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 20:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.melindasnodgrass.com/musings/2008/07/09/mainlining-movies/#comment-1976</guid>
					<description>I know.  That pinged me too.  I was waiting for the plant to turn into a little shriveled blacked husk.  I thought the movie was going to be about them trying to _prove_ they had found a plant. 

Then I realized it was a cartoon, and somebody wasn't rigorous so I made up a little metal story.  "There was a force field around them so the plant didn't die."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know.  That pinged me too.  I was waiting for the plant to turn into a little shriveled blacked husk.  I thought the movie was going to be about them trying to _prove_ they had found a plant. </p>
<p>Then I realized it was a cartoon, and somebody wasn&#8217;t rigorous so I made up a little metal story.  &#8220;There was a force field around them so the plant didn&#8217;t die.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mainlining Movies by S.C. Butler</title>
		<link>http://www.melindasnodgrass.com/musings/2008/07/09/mainlining-movies/#comment-1975</link>
		<author>S.C. Butler</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 20:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.melindasnodgrass.com/musings/2008/07/09/mainlining-movies/#comment-1975</guid>
					<description>Bah, humbug.  I liked Wall-E a lot, but it was basically ruined for me when Wall-E presents Eva with the plant in OUTER SPACE!!!!!

Oy.  Bad plant science in a movie about ecology.  Much worse than explosions in a vacuum.

I know it's a cartoon.  But still.  I think I'm going to blog about this at SFNovelists later this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah, humbug.  I liked Wall-E a lot, but it was basically ruined for me when Wall-E presents Eva with the plant in OUTER SPACE!!!!!</p>
<p>Oy.  Bad plant science in a movie about ecology.  Much worse than explosions in a vacuum.</p>
<p>I know it&#8217;s a cartoon.  But still.  I think I&#8217;m going to blog about this at SFNovelists later this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mainlining Movies by Betty Williamson</title>
		<link>http://www.melindasnodgrass.com/musings/2008/07/09/mainlining-movies/#comment-1974</link>
		<author>Betty Williamson</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 15:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.melindasnodgrass.com/musings/2008/07/09/mainlining-movies/#comment-1974</guid>
					<description>Haven't seen "Hancock" or "Wanted," but we, too, loved "Wall*E" and for lots of the same reasons.  What a charmer!  Those folks at Pixar are geniuses.  You can nearly hear them chuckling in the background and imagine them coming up with each clever addition..."I know...let's make the sidekick a cockroach!  And have it live in a Twinkie!"

I agree with you about the human scenes...the wordless robot scenes were so wonderful that we wondered if the whole movie could have been done as a silent and still worked.  My vote is yes (as long as they still included the "Hello Dolly" clips!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t seen &#8220;Hancock&#8221; or &#8220;Wanted,&#8221; but we, too, loved &#8220;Wall*E&#8221; and for lots of the same reasons.  What a charmer!  Those folks at Pixar are geniuses.  You can nearly hear them chuckling in the background and imagine them coming up with each clever addition&#8230;&#8221;I know&#8230;let&#8217;s make the sidekick a cockroach!  And have it live in a Twinkie!&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree with you about the human scenes&#8230;the wordless robot scenes were so wonderful that we wondered if the whole movie could have been done as a silent and still worked.  My vote is yes (as long as they still included the &#8220;Hello Dolly&#8221; clips!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mainlining Movies by Stephen Leigh</title>
		<link>http://www.melindasnodgrass.com/musings/2008/07/09/mainlining-movies/#comment-1972</link>
		<author>Stephen Leigh</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.melindasnodgrass.com/musings/2008/07/09/mainlining-movies/#comment-1972</guid>
					<description>I had essentially the same reaction to Hancock:  http://sleigh.livejournal.com/200010.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had essentially the same reaction to Hancock:  <a href="http://sleigh.livejournal.com/200010.html" rel="nofollow">http://sleigh.livejournal.com/200010.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Holiday Fun by Fred Kiesche</title>
		<link>http://www.melindasnodgrass.com/musings/2008/07/07/holiday-fun/#comment-1968</link>
		<author>Fred Kiesche</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 02:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.melindasnodgrass.com/musings/2008/07/07/holiday-fun/#comment-1968</guid>
					<description>Pat and I exchange cooking hints and tips all the time. Someday we'll actually have a cook-off!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat and I exchange cooking hints and tips all the time. Someday we&#8217;ll actually have a cook-off!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Robin Hood by William H. Stoddard</title>
		<link>http://www.melindasnodgrass.com/musings/2008/06/25/robin-hood/#comment-1967</link>
		<author>William H. Stoddard</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.melindasnodgrass.com/musings/2008/06/25/robin-hood/#comment-1967</guid>
					<description>I haven't seen much in the way of protection of female characters in the RPGs I run, not even the ones in (quasi-) historical settings. I'm not sure if my women players are significantly younger than you are—they range from just past 30 to mid-40s. It may just be a statistical fluctuation rather than a generational difference.

At this exact instant, my collection of players is 60% female, though that's partly because one of the guys who's signed up for a planned campaign hasn't finished designing his character, and I'm not sure he'll make it—we've already postponed the first session by a month on his account, and if he holds us up again he's out. But they're oddly sorted out: three men and a woman in the present-day superhero campaign, five women and a man in the high fantasy campaign about privateers sailing under Atlantean letters of marque in the seas of myth (but three of the five women are playing cross-gender—on the other hand, so is the laggard man in the superhero campaign). I suppose there is some tendency for women to play cross-gender, but some of my most combat-enthusiastic women have never done so, not even in campaigns in historical settings. Of course, a campaign about the vampire slayer in 1817 Alta California had an excuse for taking liberties with history and authentic cultural attitudes. . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen much in the way of protection of female characters in the RPGs I run, not even the ones in (quasi-) historical settings. I&#8217;m not sure if my women players are significantly younger than you are—they range from just past 30 to mid-40s. It may just be a statistical fluctuation rather than a generational difference.</p>
<p>At this exact instant, my collection of players is 60% female, though that&#8217;s partly because one of the guys who&#8217;s signed up for a planned campaign hasn&#8217;t finished designing his character, and I&#8217;m not sure he&#8217;ll make it—we&#8217;ve already postponed the first session by a month on his account, and if he holds us up again he&#8217;s out. But they&#8217;re oddly sorted out: three men and a woman in the present-day superhero campaign, five women and a man in the high fantasy campaign about privateers sailing under Atlantean letters of marque in the seas of myth (but three of the five women are playing cross-gender—on the other hand, so is the laggard man in the superhero campaign). I suppose there is some tendency for women to play cross-gender, but some of my most combat-enthusiastic women have never done so, not even in campaigns in historical settings. Of course, a campaign about the vampire slayer in 1817 Alta California had an excuse for taking liberties with history and authentic cultural attitudes. . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
